
Draymond Green Targeted? Controversial Calls and Bias Allegations Overshadow Warriors’ Game 3 Defeat
Ahead of Game 3 in the Golden State Warriors’ playoff series against the Minnesota Timberwolves, veteran forward Draymond Green once again found himself at the center of controversy—both on and off the court. Following a dramatic Game 2, in which Green was handed a questionable technical foul and subjected to harsh verbal abuse from a Timberwolves fan, the outspoken star addressed the recurring public perception that unfairly labels him as the stereotypical “angry Black man.” His comments sparked debate, highlighting broader issues of racial bias and media narratives in the NBA.
With emotions already running high, Green entered Game 3 walking a disciplinary tightrope, knowing that any additional technical foul would result in a one-game suspension. But his greatest challenge came not from the Timberwolves, but from the officiating crew, particularly lead referee Scott Foster. Green was closely scrutinized throughout the game and ultimately fouled out with 4:38 remaining in the fourth quarter, leaving the Warriors trailing 84-82. Without their defensive anchor, the team fell 102-97, a defeat that felt as much shaped by the whistle as by the scoreboard.
Green’s stat line was far from stellar—just two points and five turnovers in 29 minutes—but the context surrounding his performance is what fueled postgame outrage. One of the most controversial moments came when he was called for a blocking foul after colliding with Timberwolves forward Julius Randle. Coach Steve Kerr challenged the call, only for Foster to uphold it, eliminating any chance of later contesting fouls that could’ve preserved Green’s presence in crunch time.
Fans erupted on social media, accusing Foster of harboring a personal vendetta against Green and manipulating the game’s outcome through biased officiating. With Stephen Curry sidelined, the Warriors needed Green’s leadership, but the combination of foul trouble and questionable calls proved too much to overcome. As Golden State faces a critical Game 4, questions linger—not just about strategy, but about fairness and consistency in NBA officiating.